25 July 2010, 9:37 am
FACT: Depictions in textbooks and museums of the so called ancestors of humans are often shown with specific facial features, skin color, and amount of hair. These depictions usually show the older “ancestors” with monkeylike features and the ones supposedly closer to humans with more humanlike features, skin tone and hair. QUESTION: Can scientists reliably reconstruct such features based on fossilized remains that they find. Answer: NO! In 2003, forensics expert Carl N. Stephan, who works in the Department of Anatomical Sciences, The University of Adelaide Australia, wrote: “The faces of earlier human ancestors can not be objectively tested.” He says that attempts to do so based on modern apes “are likely to be heavily biased. grossly inaccurate and invalid.” His conclusion? “Any facial ‘reconstructions’ of earlier hominids are likely to be misleading.” (Reference: Science and Justice, Vol 43, No.4 (2003) section, Forensic Anthropology, “Anthropological Facial ‘Reconstruction’—Recognizing the Fallacies, ‘Unembracing’ the Errors, and Realizing Method Limits” by C.N. Stephan, p.195 ) What about you… 1. ARE YOU STILL BEING MISLED BY YOUR EVOLUTION TEXT BOOKS?? 2. GIVEN THE ABOVE, WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE SCRIPTURES BELOW? 1 Corinthians 3:19-20 (New International Version) For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God's sight. As it is written: "He catches the wise in their craftiness; and again, "The Lord knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile." 2 Thessalonians 2:11 (New International Version) For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie..... Read More »
Share on del.icio.us
Share on digg
Share on Technorati
Share on reddit
Share on Yahoo!
Share on Furl
